

![]() |
| Is it possible that a reclusive man-like
creature inhabits the remote areas of our planet? Why not ? Isn't it arrogant
of us to assume we know of all the species on this huge planet ? Scientists
will tell you that we don't. Only a few years ago, a unknown animal now
named the Okapi was discovered. What about creatures we know of , but are
thought to be extinct ? The coelacanth was thought to be extinct for 70
million years until they were discovered alive and well in 1938. So is
it really that hard to believe that a hair covered, man-like creature could
exist on the verge of discovery ? In many remote areas of the world there
have been sightings of just such a creature. Known by many names such as
Sasquatch, Yeti, Almas and many more. Is this an unknown primate, the "missing
link" or some other yet unknown species ? There is evidence to support
the existence of just such a creature in the Northwestern United States
as well as other remote areas.
There are still numerous sightings every
year. The descriptions of the creatures are very similar from sighting
to sighting. There are discrepancies in some of the details but the mind
does play tricks on us when frightened. Exaggeration and hoaxes do account
for some of the discrepancies in the descriptions as well. The height
is the most varied detail. Witnesses have reported the creatures to be
from 5'6" to 8' +. This is easily explained if you take into account the
possible age difference of the particular creature. Did they see and adult
or juvenile ? There would be a noticeable size difference depending on
the age.
|
Sightings![]() Over the years, rumors abounded that Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin hoaxed the whole incident. It even went further by saying that a special effects man named John Chambers, who designed the makeup in the Planet of the Apes movies, designed the suit. He has denied any involvement. Movie special effects people claim the film is just a man in a suit. Some scientists still cling to their belief that the film is authentic. Sadly, Roger Patterson died in 1972 of cancer. Did he go to his grave laughing? Or did he firmly believe at the time of his death that he had seen Bigfoot? In March of 1992, Bob Gimlin admitted that he might have been fooled. He gave thought to the possibility that Roger concocted the whole thing and Bob was an unknowing eyewitness to one of the most elaborate hoaxes in the world. - adamwolf@theshadowlands. net Additional Notes: The creature that was filmed was a female, while you cannot see in this view, breast are clearly visible in in other frames of the film. Scientists who have studied the film have said that the estimated stride of the creature is larger than that of a man. They also say it would have been very difficult for a man for simulate this large stride. Footprints were also found later at the same location. The footprints were the same type as typically found at a Bigfoot sighting. This
photo is one of several taken July 11, 1995 by an off-duty forest patrol
officer in the Wild Creek area near Mt. Rainier. It is one of 7 other photos
purchased from the officer by Bigfoot investigator Cliff Crook. The ranger
was following up a lead on bear poachers in the area when he heard loud
splashing sounds below him. He peeked over the ridge to investigate with
camera in hand. Some of the photos are shaded and others are of excellent
clarity.
"No matter how convincing supposed Bigfoot photos or films may be, until the ultimate living proof is in, alleged Bigfoot photos and films must remain alleged. Only the true test of time will tell." - Cliff Crook The sighting report on this case ![]()
On August 26, 1957, William Roe provided a sworn statement about his encounter with a Bigfoot. Roe, who had worked as a hunter, trapper, and a road worker, was working in British Columbia in 1955. He had hiked five miles up Mica Mountain to explore a deserted mine. When Roe stepped out of a clearing,
he saw what he thought was a grizzly bear. When the animal stood
up, he realized this was no grizzly bear! The animal, a female, was
six feet tall, three feet wide, and weighed approximately 300 lbs.
Her arms reached almost to her knees, and when she
Roe was hiding in some brush and was able to observe the creature from a distance of some 20 feet. He watched, fascinated, as she used her white, even teeth to eat leaves from a nearby bush. Her head was "higher at the back than at the front"; her nose was flat. Only the area around her mouth was bare - the rest of her body was covered in hair, none of which was longer than an inch. The ears looked very much like a human's. The eyes were small and dark, similar to a bear's. At this point, the animal caught Roe's scent and walked back the way she had come, looking over her shoulder as she went. As she disappeared into the bush, Roe heard her make a sound he described as "a kind of a whinny". Roe wanted to find out whether the animal was a vegetarian or whether she consumed meat as well. He searched for and found signs (feces) in several places. Upon examination, no hair or insect shells were found. Roe concluded this animal lived solely on vegetation. While Roe could not be sure this creature was, in fact, a Bigfoot, the logical conclusion is that he was fortunate enough to be able to observe this elusive creature up close. by CurlyJoe@theshadowlands.net |
|
|
|
|
|
Bigfoot Field Guide
Informational Video-Memorial Day Footage
The famous Memorial Day
footage that has a purported Bigfoot running across a hillside.
|
| The Bigfoot Field Guide-The Freeman Footage |
Paul Freeman Footage |
|
Manitoba Bigfoot, this is
actual footage of the creature that was filmed in Manitoba Canada in 2005.
|
This footage was shot in the Florda Everglades
and is purportedly of the Florida Bigfoot or Skunk Ape |
|
Bigfoot from Helo, Middle
Tennessee 4/27/07
More footage due to
interest. This thing ran into swamp SE of sighting.
|
Texas Report on N.W. Bigfoot |
|
Hunter Spots Bigfoot In
Pennsylvania Woods
A man hunting north of
Pittsburgh said his camera captured images of bigfoot.
|
![]() |
Wild Creek photo © 1998 Cliff Crook
(c)Cliff Crook/Fortean Pic Lib. 2000
The other images on this page were obtained from publicly available sources, and to the best of our knowledge, the images are in the public domain. If you own the copyright on any image on this page, and you would like us to remove it, please identify yourself and the image, and we will. If you own the copyright and you are willing to give us permission to use the image, we would like to know that also, thank you.
© 2007 davejuliano@theshadowlands.net